Hannah arendt banality evil thesis
Hannah arendt banality evil thesis
She points out that Eichmann was kidnapped by Israeli agents in Argentina and transported to Israel, an illegal act, and that he was tried in Israel even though he was not accused of committing any crimes there. Arendt took great care to differentiate between the banal and the commonplace, but some reviewers — as those pre-bent on a reflexive rebuttal are always apt to do — accused her of suggesting that the atrocity of the Holocaust had been commonplace, which of course was the very opposite of her point. Everything is organized by a police force that gives me the creeps, speaks only Hebrew, and looks Arabic. It takes me hundreds of hours a month to research and compose, and thousands of dollars to sustain. But the banality of evil cannot be regarded as a fact. On Eichmann's personality, Arendt concludes: Despite all the efforts of the prosecution, everybody could see that this man was not a "monster," but it was difficult indeed not to suspect that he was a clown. Eichmann claimed this changed when he was charged with carrying out the Final Solution , at which point Arendt claims "he had ceased to live according to Kantian principles, that he had known it, and that he had consoled himself with the thoughts that he no longer 'was master of his own deeds,' that he was unable 'to change anything'" p. According to his findings, Arendt attended only part of the trial, witnessing Eichmann's testimony for "at most four days" and basing her writings mostly on recordings and the trial transcript. In , he failed in his attempt to join the Schlaraffia a men's organization similar to Freemasonry , at which point a family friend and future war criminal Ernst Kaltenbrunner encouraged him to join the SS. One man will always be left alive to tell the story. And outside the doors, the Oriental mob, as if one were in Istanbul or some other half- Asiatic country. In France, where the term had much the same career, the novelist Gustave Flaubert complained in that his country had become a place where "the banal, the facile, and the foolish are invariably applauded, adopted, and adored"--a development he blamed largely on the increasing popularity of that most modern creation, the newspaper. It is permeated with expressions of Nazi ideology… [Eichmann] accepted and espoused the idea of racial purity. What was most disturbing about totalitarian regimes, she often suggested in the last decade of her life, was their production of "ordinary" bureaucratic men who lead compartmentalized lives--dutifully and even eagerly obeying orders to kill and torture people during the day while remaining good family men at night.
The court in Jerusalem did not pursue either option. Inhe failed in his attempt to join the Schlaraffia a men's organization similar to Freemasonryat which point a family friend and future war criminal Ernst Kaltenbrunner encouraged him to join the SS.
Hannah arendt books
Overview[ edit ] Arendt's subtitle famously introduced the phrase "the banality of evil," which also serves as the final words of the book. It is an aesthetic term, not a moral one. The pseudoscientific categorization of millions of people as less than human and therefore worthy of extermination is a repulsive idea, but it is not a banal or "commonplace" idea. Below them, the prosecuting attorneys, Galicians, but still Europeans. Your support really matters. Israel was a signatory to the UN Genocide Convention , which rejected universal jurisdiction and required that defendants be tried 'in the territory of which the act was committed' or by an international tribunal. Thus, he alleges that Arendt's claims that his motives were "banal" and non-ideological and that he had abdicated his autonomy of choice by obeying Hitler's orders without question may stand on weak foundations. And outside the doors, the Oriental mob, as if one were in Istanbul or some other half- Asiatic country. Writing only recently in the New York Review of Books, the Israeli journalist Amos Elon rehearsed many of the old arguments again, suggesting that those who were unable to accept Arendt's view of Eichmann as an evildoer devoid of evil qualities were led astray by their repugnance toward his crimes. Arendt ended the book by writing: And just as you [Eichmann] supported and carried out a policy of not wanting to share the earth with the Jewish people and the people of a number of other nations—as though you and your superiors had any right to determine who should and who should not inhabit the world—we find that no one, that is, no member of the human race, can be expected to want to share the earth with you. It makes sense to use the term banal when talking about ideas, but are the ideas that motivated the leading Nazis banal? In the introduction to Thinking, which she wrote in the early s, she says: "The deeds [of Eichmann] were monstrous, but the doer. As she wrote to McCarthy, "One sees that Eichmann was much less influenced by ideology than I assumed in the book on totalitarianism. My point would be that what the whole furor is about are facts, and neither theories nor ideas. Banality, in this sense, does not mean that Eichmann's actions were in any way ordinary, or even that there is a potential Eichmann in all of us, but that his actions were motivated by a sort of stupidity which was wholly unexceptional.
Musmanno argued that Arendt revealed "so frequently her own prejudices" that it could not stand as an accurate work. Secular intellectuals were left groping for new explanations, and to many it appeared that Arendt had found one.
Humanly speaking, no more is required, and no more can reasonably be asked, for this planet to remain a place fit for human habitation. Yet in her writings before Eichmann in Jerusalem, she actually took an opposite position.
Its modern meaning--commonplace, trivial, without originality--did not arise until the 19th century. Long live Germany, long live Argentina, long live Austria.
Hannah arendt heidegger
One instance of this came mere weeks after the publication of her articles in the form of an article entitled "Man With an Unspotted Conscience". It applies more to ideas, as Flaubert used it, than to deeds. This notion of a motiveless, thoughtless bureaucratic man was what she meant by the "banality of evil. She saw the ordinary-looking functionary, but not the ideologically evil warrior. In The Human Condition , she argued that bureaucracy, which she defined as "rule by nobody," is "not necessarily no-rule; it may indeed, under certain circumstances, even turn out to be one of its cruelest and most tyrannical versions. Yet in her writings before Eichmann in Jerusalem, she actually took an opposite position. Might the problem of good and evil, our faculty for telling right from wrong, be connected with our faculty of thought? As she wrote to McCarthy, "One sees that Eichmann was much less influenced by ideology than I assumed in the book on totalitarianism. Then she quotes Eichmann as saying: "After a short while, gentlemen, we shall all meet again.
based on 46 review