Guidelines critiquing research paper

Guidelines critiquing research paper

Methodological appraisal of a paper on nurses in abortion care. Is each result discussed in terms of its agreement or disagreement with previous results obtained by other researchers in other studies? Epub Jan Are recommendations for future action made? Are generalizations consistent with the results? Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described? If parametric tests were used, is there evidence that the researcher avoided violating the required assumptions for parametric tests? These have become core skills to acquire since implementing up to date evidence is the cornerstone of contemporary nursing practice. Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients? A guide to critiquing a research paper. What is are the major finding s? Are the size and major characteristics of the population studied described? Did the researcher avoid the use of volunteers? What is are the research question s or hypothesis?

Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed? Are the possible effects of uncontrolled variables on the results discussed?

research article critique example apa

Is each instrument described in terms of purpose and content? If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described? Are recommendations for future research made?

How to critique a research proposal

If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? Was every hypothesis tested? It was chosen because it is pragmatic, clearly laid out and accessible as full text to the people likely to need it. Nurse Educ Today. Electronic address: anne. Discussion Conclusions and Recommendation 1. Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented? Are the possible effects of uncontrolled variables on the results discussed?

Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients? How was the data analyzed? If a pilot study was conducted, are its execution and results described as well as its impact on the subsequent study?

Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? Are generalizations consistent with the results? If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described?

Rated 6/10 based on 102 review
Download
Guidelines for critique of a research report.